Education
Building a supportive bridge between EARLY YEARS and PRIMARY SCHOOL
A smooth transition between early years and primary school can only be achieved through a combined effort of all the stakeholders, believes Firdaus F Lalkaka.
Going to school is an exciting as well as a challenging time for young children and their families. Moving from early childhood education to an elementary school can be a positive and rewarding experience that sets children up for a happy and successful academic pathway. It can also be a period of vulnerability for many children. Effective transitions are critical to the development of children’s self-worth, confidence and resilience, and ongoing success at school. This is a time to build relationships, maintain excitement for learning and ensure children experience continuity in their learning. Ensuring continuity of learning poses quite a challenge while children move through preschool, elementary school and beyond as children are required to become familiar with new people, practices and expectations. Unless the “learning” that the children have achieved during their preschool years seamlessly transfers to and is built on, in the next stage of elementary school, it will get interrupted and cause impediments in their progress and achievement. A smooth transition can only be achieved through a combined effort of all the stakeholders namely, the government (through a robust policy framework), the schools (preschools and elementary schools) and the parents.
In order to better achieve the objective of “inclusion” under RTE for ensuring a smoother transition especially for children coming from disadvantaged families, rather than laying emphasis on preparing the “child to be ready for school,” India would greatly benefit by considering a shift of emphasis to making the “schools ready for a child”.
A. Government Policy: Suggestions
1) The 25% quota of admissions u/s 12(1)(c) of RTE Act should be made applicable beginning from the lowest section of preschool i.e. from nursery onwards instead of from class as is presently being done. For a disadvantaged child to enter schooling from class 1 without a preschool education is as risky as attempting to board a speeding bus – it’s a surefire recipe for FAILURE!
2) Need for a robust monitoring and evaluation system to handhold disadvantaged children who are admitted to an English-medium school to ensure that such children don’t get disillusioned and ultimately drop-out.
3) Need for a “One-Nation-OnePolicy” for ECCE: This involves:-
-Fixation of common “Age-atEntry” norms and a common “cutoff ” date
* (PG @ 2+, Nur @ 3+, Jr.KG @ 4+, Sr.KG @ 5+ & Std-1 @ 6+)
* With the academic year commencing in June, cut-off date should be May 31.
Designing of a developmentally appropriate ECCE and Elementary School Curriculum that is in alignment with the learning milestones to ensure a smooth transition sans any overlaps.
Defining minimum infrastructure specifications for preschools
Defining child safety norms, etc
Defining the maximum number of children per class
Scientifically designed progress reports of children that are focused on capturing the achievement of learning milestones
Leveraging technology to ensure full compliance under RTE and ensure that no child is left behind
Ensuring timely re-imbursement of fees of admissions done under RTE
4) Bearing in mind the recent instances of assault and abuse of preschoolers, it would be in the best interest of children for the government to consider drafting of a policy which makes it mandatory to run a preschool from an exclusive premise rather than from within the premises of a primary/ secondary school.
5) Priority should be given by “neighbourhood” elementary schools while granting admission in class 1 to children enrolled in neighbourhood preschools.
6) To uphold the Right to Equality (guaranteed under the Constitution of India) of all children to secure admission in class 1 regardless of whether they are doing their preschooling in a standalone preschool or a preschool run by a recognised school, the government MUST ensure that admission is granted on either first-come-first-served basis or on draw of lots (as is already approved by the Education dept.).
7) Pressing need for building an evaluation model that promotes children based on achievement of learning outcomes rather than on an examination-based model which encourages rote learning.
8) Isn’t “nation building” everyone’s responsibility?: There is no logical reason why provisions of RTE Act should not be applicable to Minority Institutions for admitting disadvantaged children under the 25% quota. If they believe in the Indian Constitution which confers upon them special rights and privileges, I fail to understand why they are unwilling to shoulder the responsibility of admitting disadvantaged children under RTE and contributing towards nation building.
9) Caught between a rock and a hard place: Rather than accepting their complete failure in discharging their constitutional responsibility of providing quality public education to its citizens and taking concrete steps to improving the quality of public education in government schools, the government is introducing laws to impose restrictions on what fees private schools can charge on one hand and forcing them to admit disadvantaged children to the extent of 25% on the other. If the government is genuinely interested in bringing quality private school education at affordable rates, they should consider giving land for free and loans for school infrastructure at special rates with long moratoriums and/or allow private enterprise to manage the existing government schools and fix a value to their services which is based on the attainment of learning outcomes in children.
B. Preschools and primary schools The ground realities have been beautifully captured in the introductory paragraphs in chapter 1 of the Report of the Committee on Pre-Primary and Pre-School Education in Delhi dated 31- 03-2007 reproduced below:
1.1 Early Childhood Care and Education has globally been recognised as critical for human resource development. The first 8 years of a child’s life are the most crucial years because during this period of early childhood the pace of development is extremely rapid, determining the cognitive and physical growth and laying the foundation for shaping the social and personal habits and values. There is a growing body of research evidence to prove that the synoptic connections in the brain that are critical for the full development of the brain’s potential take place during the early phase of childhood.
1.2 Early Childhood Development includes two main aspects, i.e., care and education. Care is a comprehensive term that includes proper nutrition, medical attention particularly in regard to immunisation, security and safety and emotional support. The ‘education’ component includes pre-school education programmes aimed at 3-6 year-olds and extends to class 1 and 2 to cover children up to the age of 8 under the Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE). However, it is to be clearly understood that ECCE is an integrated programme that takes into account the synergistic and interdependent relationship between health, nutrition, intellectual, social and emotional development and education, addressing the imperative of holistic and all-round development of the child.
Thus, it can be seen that any discussion on pre-primary education cannot exclude other aspects of early childhood development. On the contrary an examination of issues relating to pre-primary education should necessarily focus on the developmental paradigm so that the cognitive, affective and psychomotor issues are comprehensively addressed in the context of education.
1.3 Changing socio-economic conditions have also thrown up new challenges. The changes in family structure brought about by transition from joint families to nuclear families coupled with the increasing propensity of both parents going to jobs have put greater pressure on Early Childhood Education especially in urban and semi-urban areas. As parents face the compulsion of keeping their children in ‘safe custody’ when they are out on work, they invariably turn to crèches, kindergarten and play schools. Parents are taking their children out of the home environment much earlier than ever before. While sending children to crèches by parents who are both employed with no elders to take care of their children cannot be faulted, the growing tendency on the part of overenthusiastic parents to initiate their children into ‘education’ much before the children are ready for it is a cause of great concern. So, the first question that is to be answered is: What is the suitable age for a child to begin pre-schooling? The other important question is about what is going on in the name of pre-schooling in a majority of schools in Delhi.
1.4 The enormous demand for preschooling facilities has led to a mushrooming of play schools, nursery schools, kindergarten, preparatory schools etc. indicative of a veritable boom in the ‘Alphabet Industry’. A majority of ‘big schools’ (schools which have classes up to 12) run not only nursery and kindergarten or preparatory classes before class I, some of these schools also have pre-nursery. Thus, a child of 2-2½ years of age enters into a system which also has adolescents of 17-18 years of age. Parents’ wish is to put their children early on into such a system so that they need not worry about their children’s future schooling up to class 12. It defies all logic of ‘child-centric’ education. Instead, the prevalent system has become either ‘parent-centric’ or ‘schoolcentric’. It is seen that, barring a few exceptions, these schools are nothing more than mere downward extension of the formal and structured education at the level of class 1 and above. The unrealistic expectations of parents for early stimulation of their children and the inappropriate learning environment offered by schools staffed by either untrained or unsuitably trained teachers have resulted in a confusing and often chaotic situation. To compound the matters further, preschooling by whatever name, does not come under any regulation.
While the provisions of Article 21A and 45 of the Indian Constitution coupled with the provisions in Sec. 3 and 11 of the RTE Act, 2009 have correctly defined the “suitable age” as being 6+ for Class-1 and 3+ for beginning preschooling, despite a specific provision in law, the government is yet to come up with a developmentally appropriate preschool curriculum that doesn’t overlap with the elementary school curriculum! The high expectations of parents coupled with elementary schools interviewing children and rejecting them for failing to have mastered advanced numeracy and writing skills in their preschool years are the two key reasons that are primarily responsible for most preschools (barring a few), succumbing to the pressure and being reduced to nothing more than a mere downward extension of the formal and structured education at the level of class 1 and above and overburdening the child and forcing him to learn and grasp concepts ahead of their time (i.e. before they attain their mental and physical milestones). This completely defeats the purpose!
And, as reiterated earlier, in order to better achieve the objective of “inclusion” under RTE for ensuring a smoother transition especially for children coming from disadvantaged families, India would greatly benefit by considering a shift of emphasis from preparing the “child to be ready for school” to making the “schools ready for a child”. And preparation of scientifically designed reports of each child would go a long way in building the bridge between the preschool and elementary school.
Hence, to ensure a smooth transition, three critical issues need to be dealt with: Defining the suitable age for a child to begin pre-schooling.
Designing of a developmentally appropriate ECCE and Elementary School Curriculum that is in alignment with the learning milestones to ensure a smooth transition sans any overlaps.
Preparation of scientifically designed reports of each child that enable the elementary school teachers hand-hold the child on and from the milestones that he has achieved
C. Parents
In my view, the parents cannot be faulted for having very high expectations from preschools because of the following reasons:
a) Not being experts in early childhood education, parents are clueless about the learning milestones or the learning outcomes expected of a child in his preschool years. Their expectations are primarily built based on what their child is being taught in his preschool as compared to what another preschool is teaching their neighbour’s child. They are also distressed by the fact that if their child hasn’t mastered the advanced numeracy and writing skills as expected by the elementary schools, then their child would fail to secure admission in a reputed school.
b) While on one hand, the government has failed to draft a standardised preschool curriculum, on the other, the elementary schools interview children and reject those who have failed to master advanced numeracy and writing skills! As a result, finding themselves between a rock and a hard place, most preschools not only have to design their own curriculum but have to design it in a manner that meets with the expectations of the elementary schools. As a result, most preschools (barring a few), land up being nothing more than a mere downward extension of the formal and structured education at the level of class 1 and above that force children to learn a curriculum that is age inappropriate and ahead of their time.
Hence, in conclusion, creating a supportive bridge between early years and primary school and beyond is critical to ensure a smooth transition to enable children to continue their progress and achievement uninterruptedly and excel in this journey called life.
The process to ensure smooth transition from preschool to primary school especially to children coming from disadvantaged families admitted under u/s 12(1)(c) of RTE Act
A class 1 primary school teacher who has worked as an ECE teacher is better equipped to bridge the learning experiences from ECE to primary school.
A class 1 primary school teacher can find out about each child’s interests, strengths, culture and capabilities through:
(a) talking with the child’s preschool teacher and parents, (b) referring to the child’s portfolio/journal, (c) ongoing observations and discussions with the child’s parents and (d) formal and informal testing.
Tweaking and tailoring aspects of the primary school curriculum based on the identification of the child’s interests, strengths, culture, capabilities, will greatly help in engaging, challenging and motivating the children
The needs and aspirations of a child with special needs would be better served if there was co-ordination between the preschool teacher and the primary school teacher.
A deeper partnership between the primary teacher and the parents too, would be very supportive.
Having a senior student as “buddy” for every child joining primary school also ensures a smooth transition through companionship in school.
Holding “remedial” classes coupled with regular parent-teacher meetings.
Having a “transitory” class is necessary to bring RTE children up to the mental level of the other children who have done preschool.
Education
OpenAI Academy Launches in India to Democratise AI Education for Students, Teachers, and Startups
In a landmark move to scale artificial intelligence education across India, OpenAI has officially launched its first international educational initiative—OpenAI Academy India—in partnership with the IndiaAI Mission under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY). The initiative aims to equip a wide cross-section of learners with AI skills, from students and educators to civil servants, entrepreneurs, and nonprofit leaders.
As part of the collaboration, OpenAI and the IndiaAI Mission have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) outlining shared goals under the “FutureSkills” pillar of the national AI strategy. The curriculum will initially be available in English and Hindi, with future plans to expand into regional languages to enhance accessibility and inclusivity.
The Academy will offer a hybrid model of digital and in-person learning, combining on-demand modules, webinars, expert-led workshops, and peer-based collaboration. The content will also be hosted on platforms such as the FutureSkills portal and the iGOT Karmayogi platform, enabling central and state government officials to upskill in emerging technologies.
One of the initiative’s most ambitious goals is to train one million teachers in the practical use of Generative AI tools in education. This is aligned with OpenAI’s broader mission to empower educators to integrate AI into classrooms meaningfully.
OpenAI will also host hackathons across seven Indian states, aiming to reach 25,000 students, and conduct workshops in six major cities. Winners of these hackathons will earn the chance to attend OpenAI Dev Day events abroad. In addition, 50 startups or fellows selected by the IndiaAI Mission will receive up to $100,000 in API credits to support their AI-based innovation projects.
Union IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw called the initiative a significant leap forward in democratising access to cutting-edge technology. “This partnership makes the latest AI tools available to India’s startup ecosystem and government workforce alike,” he noted, adding that it will accelerate local innovation and adoption.
Jason Kwon, Chief Strategy Officer of OpenAI, praised India’s growing influence in the global AI landscape. “India is one of the most dynamic countries for AI development. We’re proud to launch OpenAI Academy India to help more people gain confidence and skills to use AI meaningfully,” he said.
The platform will host a free Knowledge Hub offering a variety of resources—video tutorials, virtual events, hands-on training modules, and community forums—designed to make AI literacy engaging and practical.
With inputs from PTI
It’s June 5. There’s a poster-making competition happening in the library. “Say No to Plastic,” one child writes, her glitter pen catching the sunlight. In the background, a teacher sips from a plastic bottle of mineral water. On the ground — a single dustbin, filled with half-eaten sandwiches, the plastic wrappers they came in, and the poster that didn’t win.
Welcome to World Environment Day. The annual ritual of colouring inside the lines of climate awareness, only to throw the sketch away at 3:00 p.m.
And nowhere is this performance of eco-consciousness more apparent than in the average Environmental Studies (EVS) class. A subject that, in theory, is about the environment. In practice, it is about completing the syllabus before the assessments begin.
EVS is full of the right words: sustainability, waste segregation, reduce-reuse-recycle. It teaches children the parts of a plant, but not how to grow one. It tells them about carbon footprints, but not about the quiet pride of switching off a fan when they leave a room.
It is, in short, a subject that ends at the bell. Let’s pause and ask: how many schools actually segregate their waste? How many have separate bins for wet and dry garbage — not just during inspection week or annual day, but on a random Tuesday in August?
Most schools don’t have a waste problem. They have a waste denial problem.
Because admitting there’s a problem would mean someone has to do something about it. And doing something is messy. It requires time, training, tantrums. It requires telling people they can’t use fifteen thermocol plates for a two-hour workshop. It requires building a system where children see that the habits they are being asked to adopt are not just lesson objectives, but lifestyle choices being modelled by the adults around them.
Right now, most EVS classes are like that school function where the Chief Guest arrives in a diesel SUV to plant a sapling. Ceremonial. Shallow. Slightly offensive.
But here’s the good news: children get it. Better than we think. They’re not too young to understand why the cafeteria needs to stop using plastic spoons. They don’t need a unit on climate change to know that the AC doesn’t have to be set to freezing for learning to happen.
They just need one thing: to see the grown-ups walking the talk.
Start small. Set up separate bins — label them, colour-code them, talk about them. Let kids bring waste from home and run a sorting drive. Make a habit of auditing your school’s paper usage. Assign class monitors for turning off switches. Let kids design posters that don’t end up in the bin — or better yet, design the bins themselves. And while you’re at it, stop calling it an EVS period.
Call it the lab of life.
If you really want children to learn how to care for the world, don’t just teach them the names of forests. Teach them how to keep their classrooms clean. Don’t just mention Greta Thunberg in a chapter. Ask what they would skip school for. Don’t say “reduce-reuse-recycle” like it’s a rhyme. Say it like it’s a revolution.
And show them the bin.
Despite India’s near-universal school enrolment at the primary level, the latest UNESCO Global Education Monitoring (GEM) Report 2024–25 paints a sobering picture of foundational learning and systemic leadership gaps in Indian education.
According to the report, over 95% of children in India are enrolled in primary school, yet basic learning outcomes remain dismal. ASER 2023 found that only 43% of Class 3 students could read a Class 2-level text, underscoring a national learning crisis.
While India boasts a 60% female workforce in elementary education, the leadership landscape tells a different story. Only 13% of vice-chancellors in central universities were women as of 2022, and formal principal training is absent in many Indian states despite NEP 2020’s mandate of 50 hours of annual professional development for school leaders.
This gender leadership gap reflects a global trend, with only 87 boys per 100 girls achieving minimum reading proficiency, and in middle-income nations like India, the number drops to 72 boys per 100 girls. The pandemic also reversed pre-COVID gains in gender parity for maths, with girls now underperforming in countries like Brazil, the UK, and Italy.
The GEM report also highlights bright spots. India’s policy commitment through NEP 2020 and innovative peer-mentorship pilots—like Delhi’s middle leadership model—demonstrate the potential of decentralised leadership to foster trust, collaboration, and improved school culture.
Global evidence cited by UNESCO shows that female-led schools in parts of Africa resulted in one full additional year of learning gain, proving that gender-inclusive leadership can enhance academic performance.
However, implementation remains inconsistent. Many leadership positions in India still lack transparent selection and promotion processes, and states fall short in meeting training targets. The digital divide, especially post-pandemic, has further deepened inequities, hitting girls in under-resourced regions the hardest.
What India Needs Next:
-
Institutionalise mandatory leadership certifications.
-
Accelerate women’s inclusion in senior roles.
-
Shift focus from enrolment to outcome-driven learning metrics.
-
Embed leadership training into teacher education.
-
Scale up local mentorship models proven to work.
The UNESCO report is a reminder that enrolment alone cannot guarantee education quality. Bridging the gap between policy intent and on-ground implementation is critical if India is to transform its education system into one that is equitable, inclusive, and future-ready.
At a time when Artificial Intelligence (AI) headlines dominate global discourse, a quieter but more consequential conversation is unfolding in India’s education sector—one that cuts through the hype to explore whether AI is genuinely improving learning outcomes or just riding a wave of fascination.
In its latest article titled “Not Just Hype: What Investors Really Think About AI in Indian Education”, Entrepreneur India reported on insights shared by Ganapathy Venugopal, Co-founder & CEO of Axilor Ventures, at the IGIS 2025 forum. Offering a candid investor’s lens, Venugopal remarked, “We’ve seen plenty of hype around AI. But for us, it’s about where the real value lies—can it solve something fundamental, like India’s teacher-student gap?” According to him, the most investable AI tools are not the flashiest but the most functional—those that support teachers, amplify their effectiveness, and reach where human resources fall short.
Echoing this, Kobi Gal from Ben-Gurion University pointed out that while AI has democratised access to learning, it hasn’t yet changed the core of how we learn. “The education system remains rigid. AI can increase reach, yes, but transformation is still elusive,” he said.
India’s edtech sector is poised for growth with its vast K–12 student base and rapidly expanding internet access. However, a major challenge remains—only 24% of households have internet, per NSSO data. This makes Tier II–IV cities a key battleground for AI-powered learning tools. Investors are now shifting focus from “edtech” as a label to learning outcomes, engagement, and job-readiness, with AI viewed as an enabler rather than a product category.
Venugopal pointedly questioned current trends: “Are we building tools to complete homework, or to change how we learn?” His statement taps into the broader tension—between consumer-friendly shortcuts and pedagogically sound, scalable solutions.
At ScooNews Global Educators Fest (SGEF) 2023, this theme of AI with a conscience was also central. Held in Jaipur, the festival brought together educators, artists, and changemakers to discuss how artificial intelligence can serve—not replace—human values in education. Noted speakers like Lakshyaraj Singh Mewar, Rama Datt, and Padma Shri Anand Kumar reinforced the idea that technology must remain grounded in empathy, inclusivity, and purpose. A memorable moment was Anand Kumar’s speech on whether AI could ever truly replace a teacher’s role—a thought-provoking precursor to the investor sentiments voiced at IGIS 2025.
The conversation today is no longer about AI replacing the classroom, but enhancing it. With investor confidence growing in tools that support hybrid delivery models, regional customisation, and lifelong learning, the sector appears headed toward a more sustainable future.
Yet, Venugopal issued a final word of caution: “We look at sectors where demand is unquestionable and the cost of not solving the problem is high. Education in India fits that bill. But we must build with humility—and rigour.”
As India’s AI-powered education future unfolds, investors, educators, and innovators alike seem to agree: the goal is not disruption for disruption’s sake, but designing systems that serve learners in meaningful, measurable ways.
📌 Stay tuned for SGEF 2025 — This year, we gather under the theme: “Purpose-Driven Education: Designing for Future Realities.” Explore how we can reimagine school curricula to align with the evolving needs of our society and the professional world. Register here
The Department of School Education & Literacy (DoSEL), Ministry of Education, observed World No Tobacco Day on 31st May 2025 with a national workshop held at Rang Bhawan, Akashvani Bhawan. Inaugurated by Sanjay Kumar, Secretary, DoSEL, the event convened key stakeholders from the Ministries of Health, Home Affairs, NCERT, CBSE, UNODC, and State representatives, alongside students, civil society members, and domain experts.
During the workshop, Kumar launched the Nationwide School Challenge on Tobacco Awareness on the MyGov platform, set to begin on 10th June 2025. Aimed at student engagement, the initiative encourages schools across India to lead awareness campaigns. Participants also took the No-Tobacco Pledge, underscoring the shared responsibility of educators and communities in protecting students from tobacco exposure.
Kumar highlighted the alarming influence of tobacco advertising on youth and emphasised the importance of proactive involvement from School Management Committees (SMCs), parents, and local bodies to create tobacco-free campuses. Additional Secretary Anandrao V. Patil reinforced this message in his keynote, focusing on student health, well-being, and preventive education.
Other key speakers included CBSE Chairperson Rahul Singh, who spoke on the integration of health and wellness modules in schools, and Economic Advisor A. Srija, who stressed inter-sectoral collaboration for effective implementation of Tobacco-Free Educational Institutions (ToFEI) Guidelines.
Technical sessions covered mental health (Manodarpan), life skills education (Navchetna), the School Health Programme, and digital monitoring of ToFEI compliance. Experts from NCERT, CBSE, UNODC, and the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare contributed insights on embedding wellness in school ecosystems.
State nodal officers from Chandigarh, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, and Puducherry presented best practices—from dental health drives to creative student engagement tools like comics and animation. Efforts to contextualise ToFEI manuals in regional languages were also shared.
The workshop concluded with a call for consistent monitoring, awareness campaigns, and holistic health education to build tobacco-free, safe learning environments.
A recent report by The Indian Express reveals a worrisome shift in India’s school enrolment patterns—more students are opting for private institutions, even in states with a robust network of government schools. During meetings held by the Ministry of Education with state officials in March–April 2025 to discuss projects under the Samagra Shiksha scheme, the Centre flagged this as a “disturbing trend.”
In states like Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, and Uttarakhand, the enrolment in unaided private schools has consistently risen despite government schools forming the majority in number. For instance, in Andhra Pradesh, 73% of schools are government-run, yet they account for just 46% of total student enrolment. Similarly, Telangana’s government schools form 70% of total schools but educate only 38% of students, compared to nearly 61% in private schools.
This trend isn’t isolated. Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Maharashtra, and several northeastern states have also reported declining numbers in government school enrolment. The Union Ministry has urged states to reverse this decline, citing the need for introspection and reform. In Tamil Nadu, for example, government schools make up 64% of the total but serve just 37% of the student population.
Interestingly, some states have responded by conducting Aadhaar-based “data cleansing” to explain the drops. Still, the Centre believes deeper, systemic issues—such as rising aspirations and perceptions of quality—are driving families towards private schooling.
The concern goes beyond statistics. According to UDISE+ 2023–24 data, 36% of total school enrolment in India (over 9 crore students) is now in private schools. In 2022–23, it was 33%. Pre-pandemic figures already indicated this steady rise.
Where Do Government Schools Go From Here?
The falling trust in government schools paints a grim picture—especially when education budgets face cuts and systemic reform remains slow. However, all is not lost. States like Madhya Pradesh are setting examples through initiatives like the CM Rise Schools, which aim to rejuvenate public education with upgraded infrastructure, teacher training, and modern pedagogy.
But such success stories remain scattered. Without strong policy backing, increased funding, and public support, the future of government schooling appears uncertain. In an era of aggressive privatisation—be it formal schooling or the booming coaching industry—government schools risk being sidelined unless urgently revitalised.
Why must they survive? Because they remain the only accessible option for millions, especially in rural and marginalised communities. They are not just institutions—they’re vehicles of social equity, offering a shot at mobility to those who may otherwise be left behind.
Education
Over 10,000 Unrecognised Schools in Bihar, Jharkhand: Education Ministry Flags Violation of RTE Act
In a startling revelation, the Ministry of Education has flagged that over 10,000 unrecognised schools are operating in Bihar and Jharkhand, enrolling more than 1.6 million students and employing over 88,000 teachers—despite being in violation of the Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009.
Jharkhand has the highest number of unrecognised schools in India, with 5,879 such institutions enrolling over 8.3 lakh students and staffed by more than 46,000 teachers. Bihar follows with 4,915 unrecognised schools, catering to over 7.7 lakh students and 42,000 teachers.
These figures emerged during the 2025-26 Project Approval Board (PAB) meetings under the Samagra Shiksha scheme, held earlier this year. The Ministry stated that the existence of these schools goes against Section 19 of the RTE Act, which mandates that all pre-existing schools meet prescribed norms within three years of the Act’s implementation. Failure to comply should lead to withdrawal of recognition and closure of the institutions.
The Ministry has directed both states to take appropriate action, either by recognising these schools through proper channels or by ensuring their closure in accordance with legal norms. Notably, Jharkhand’s education department has formed district-level recognition committees and claims that many of these schools began operations before the RTE Act came into effect.
Additionally, the Ministry raised concerns over discrepancies in data regarding Out-of-School Children (OoSC). For 2023–24, Jharkhand reported 37,409 OoSC on the PRABANDH portal, whereas the NSSO survey for 2022–23 recorded 1,07,639 ‘never enrolled’ children aged 6–14. In Bihar, the contrast was even more stark: 33,285 OoSC on PRABANDH versus 6.27 lakh ‘never enrolled’ according to NSSO.
To address this gap, the Ministry has advised strict data monitoring and called for special enrolment drives, with full support from School Management Committees (SMCs), to bring every child back into the education system.
Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan delivered the valedictory address at the PadhAI: Conclave on AI in Education, held in New Delhi and organised by the Centre of Policy Research and Governance (CPRG). The two-day conclave brought together senior policymakers, educationists, and technology experts to discuss the growing role of artificial intelligence in reshaping India’s education landscape.
In his address, Pradhan emphasised that artificial intelligence is not merely a technological tool, but a transformative force and a catalyst for innovation in education. “AI is a bridge between empathy and technology,” he said, underlining the need for India’s human intelligence to take the lead in the global AI revolution.
The Minister highlighted several initiatives undertaken by the government to promote AI in education, including the establishment of Centres of Excellence in AI and plans to promote AI integration in Indian languages. He stressed that leveraging AI to foster critical thinking in classrooms was no longer optional but essential, marking a transition from “chalkboards to chipsets.”
He also called upon academicians and technologists to collaborate on policy suggestions that would enable India to responsibly and effectively integrate AI in school and higher education systems.
The conclave featured a series of panel discussions and keynote addresses exploring how AI is transforming classroom teaching, expanding learning beyond the four walls, and the structural challenges that need to be addressed for effective implementation.
Notable speakers included Jitin Prasada, Minister of State for Commerce & Industry and Electronics & IT; Ashish Sood, Minister for Education and Higher Education, Delhi; Vineet Joshi, Secretary, Department of Higher Education and Chairperson, UGC; Abhishek Singh, CEO, IndiaAI Mission; Pankaj Arora, Chairperson, NCTE; Anil Sahasrabudhe, Chairman, NETF; Yogesh Singh, Vice Chancellor, University of Delhi; Sanjeev Bikhchandani, Co-founder, Info Edge; and Rashmi Das, Chairperson, Higashi Autism School.
The event concluded with a call for increased collaboration between the public and private sectors to harness AI for inclusive and accessible education.
In a significant development for India’s higher education sector, the University of Liverpool—one of the United Kingdom’s most prestigious academic institutions and a member of the Russell Group—has announced plans to establish its first international campus in Bengaluru. The university aims to commence operations by 2026.
This marks the first time a Russell Group university, often likened to the Ivy League for UK higher education, will set up a physical campus in India. Known for its world-class research and academic rigour, the University of Liverpool was founded in 1881 and has produced nine Nobel laureates. Its entry into the Indian education landscape is expected to bolster the globalisation of Indian higher education and widen access to top-tier international programmes.
Initially, the Bengaluru campus will offer undergraduate and postgraduate courses in Business Management, Accounting and Finance, Computer Science, Biomedical Sciences, and Game Design—making it the first UK university to offer these programmes from within India. The range of disciplines is expected to expand over time.
Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah hailed the development as a “landmark moment” in the state’s educational journey. “For many years, our brightest minds left the country to study abroad. Today, a top global university is choosing to come here,” he said, adding that the government would ensure full support through policy and infrastructure.
In a move to bridge industry and academia, the university also signed an MoU with Bengaluru-based IT major Wipro to collaborate on research, innovation, and skill-building programmes.
Delhi University’s Executive Council (EC) has approved sweeping curriculum revisions that have sparked sharp protests from faculty members, igniting a fresh debate over academic freedom, ideological influence, and the future of higher education in India. The changes, ratified during the EC’s 1,275th meeting, affect multiple departments including Psychology, Sociology, and English, and introduce new programmes in journalism and nuclear medicine.
Among the most contentious shifts is the removal of conflict-based case studies from the Psychology of Peace paper. Case references to Kashmir, Palestine, India-Pakistan relations, and the Northeast have been replaced with conflict-resolution examples drawn from Indian epics like the Mahabharata and Bhagavad Gita. Similarly, a Sociology paper has dropped foundational thinkers like Karl Marx and Thomas Robert Malthus, along with key sections such as the Sociology of Food and the critical lens on the Sociology of Law.
Faculty members are sounding the alarm. As per a story in Business Standard, EC member and Associate Professor at Kirori Mal College, Rudrashish Chakraborty, called the changes “a complete disregard for disciplinary expertise” and warned they could severely damage DU’s global academic standing.
At the heart of the backlash is a deeper concern about ideological overreach in curriculum design. Critics say the move replaces rigorous, research-based frameworks with selectively religious narratives, undermining the pluralism that once defined Indian academia.
Why These Topics Were in the Curriculum in the First Place
Incorporating geopolitical issues like Kashmir and Palestine in social science syllabi wasn’t about courting controversy—it was about helping students understand conflict, diplomacy, and peace-building through lived realities. Scholars like Marx and Malthus, often labelled as ideologues, contributed frameworks that shaped global discourse on inequality, population, labour, and social justice. To erase them from academic memory is not just selective—it’s intellectually dishonest.
Their inclusion wasn’t about promoting one ideology over another but about exposing students to a spectrum of thought. If academic institutions stop encouraging intellectual plurality, they risk becoming echo chambers that simply mirror prevailing politics.
What Could Have Been Done Differently
If the aim was truly to Indianise or decolonise the curriculum—as has been cited in many recent reforms—it could have been done with scholarly rigour. Including Indian thinkers alongside global ones, offering critical engagement rather than replacement, and developing interdisciplinary modules that draw on Indian social realities would have strengthened rather than diluted the curriculum.
A meaningful curriculum reform should be inclusive, consultative, and pedagogically sound. Instead, these changes appear abrupt and top-down, with several faculty members alleging they were not adequately consulted. As one member remarked, “Modernisation cannot come at the cost of academic autonomy.”
The counter to a whitewashed curriculum should not be to do the exact opposite. Figures like Karl Marx are not just ideologists; their legacies extend beyond nation-states. They presented global ideas that remain relevant to Indian society, especially in an age grappling with inequality and labour rights.
And religion—while an important part of many societies—must never dominate education policy. When one faith is elevated in academic materials meant for students of all backgrounds, it chips away at the secular fabric of our democracy.
Replacing complex geopolitical issues with religious scripture is not only pedagogically flawed—it’s, frankly, a dangerous precedent.
New Programmes and Policy Decisions
Beyond the curriculum overhaul, DU has also announced the launch of a two-year M.A. in Journalism in both Hindi and English, and a BSc in Nuclear Medicine Technology, to be offered at the Army Hospital (R&R) for Armed Forces Medical Services personnel. The EC also introduced a new policy for determining teacher seniority, with age taking precedence over API scores when qualifications are equal.
A committee has been constituted to assess the implications of a DoPT circular mandating periodic review of employees aged 50 and above—raising concerns about forced retirement policies within the university system.
As the NEP rollout moves ahead, universities like DU need to walk the path wisely. Reforms should fuel learning, not push a story. Education isn’t meant to box students into ideologies—it’s meant to open minds, spark debate, and shape citizens who can think for themselves. Our classrooms should dig deeper, not go narrow. We can’t afford to swap knowledge for one-sided thinking.
OpenAI Academy Launches in India to Democratise AI Education for Students, Teachers, and Startups
World Environment Day: Why Your School’s Environmental Education Needs a Cleanup
UNESCO Flags Foundational Learning Crisis & Leadership Gaps in India’s Education System
Beyond the Buzz: Investors Call for Grounded AI Innovation in Indian Classrooms
Education Ministry Launches National Drive for Healthier, Safer Schools
Government School Enrolment Drops Across States, Centre Flags ‘Disturbing Trend’
Over 10,000 Unrecognised Schools in Bihar, Jharkhand: Education Ministry Flags Violation of RTE Act
PadhAI Conclave Highlights Urgent Role of Artificial Intelligence in Indian Education
University of Liverpool to Open First International Campus in Bengaluru by 2026
Curriculum Controversy at Delhi University: Academic Voices Clash Over Syllabus Overhaul
CBSE Directs Schools to Map Mother Tongues, Pushes for Multilingual Classrooms in Foundational Years
Ministry of Education Launches Month-Long Nationwide Drive to Make Schools and Colleges Tobacco-Free
Banu Mushtaq’s International Booker Win Is a Wake-Up Call for Indian Schools to Reclaim Literature
Kerala Reimagines Schooling: Social Awareness Over Syllabi in Bold New Reforms
Mizoram Declared First Fully Literate State in India
Delhi Government Schools to Introduce ‘Kaushal Bodh’ Pre-Vocational Programme for Classes 6 to 8
Human (Soft) Skills: The Missing Piece in School Curriculums
CBSE’s ‘Sugar Boards’ Initiative: Tackling the Sweet Crisis in Indian Schools
India-Turkey Relations Sour: Indian Universities Suspend Academic Ties Over National Security Concerns
Geopolitics in Classrooms: Why India’s Students Need to Understand the World Beyond Borders
UK’s New Immigration Rules: What They Mean for Indian Students
Maharashtra Launches Statewide Staff Mapping Drive for Schools
Indian Students Flock to Singapore, Ireland, and Dubai for Higher Studies: 38% Surge Recorded
John King’s Book ‘Teacher By Teacher’: A Global Tribute to the Transformative Power of Education
Operation Sindoor and Operation Abhyaas: Navigating School Safety and Student Well-being Amid Rising Tensions
Sudha Murty Advocates Mandatory Training and Exams for Teachers Every Three Years
Hello Kids Expands to 1,000 Centres, Aims for 2,000 by 2028
Nagaland Schools Launch ‘Adolescent Girls Club’ to Empower Young Girls Under Mission Shakti
“Be the Change in a Changing World”: Anita Karwal and Anju Chazot Reflect on NEP 2020
CBSE Warns Dummy School Students May Be Barred from Board Exams
CBSE’s ‘Sugar Boards’ Initiative: Tackling the Sweet Crisis in Indian Schools
Is Your School Following These Mandatory CBSE Committees?
Maharashtra to Regulate Pre-Primary Education with New Law Aligned to NEP 2020
Sunbeam Indiranagar Shines in Academics, Arts, and Sports, Cementing Its Legacy of Holistic Education
Rewriting Ambedkar: Why Students Must Know the Man Beyond the Constitution
China Embarks on Ambitious AI-Driven Education Reform to Build a ‘Strong Education Nation’ by 2035
‘Baalpan ki Kavita’ Initiative Launched to Restore Indian Rhymes for Young Learners
MAHAJYOTI’s Book Distribution Scheme to Empower 7,000 OBC Students Preparing for JEE/NEET & MHT-CET
India Bids Farewell to NEP Architect Dr K. Kasturirangan
CBSE Mandates 50-Hour Annual Training for Teachers, Declares STEM as 2025 Theme
Pradhan Mantri Rashtriya Bal Puraskar 2025: Nominations Now Open for India’s Young Achievers
CBSE Introduces Mandatory Bridge Course for Classes 6 to 12 in Chhattisgarh Under NEP 2020
NCERT Class 7 Textbooks Updated: Mughals Removed, Focus on Indian Ethos and Pilgrimage
Delhi Government Cracks Down on Dummy Schooling; Over 600 Schools Inspected, 10 Issued Notices
Stonehill International School Students Shine in Spectacular Performance of In the Heights
IIT Guwahati Developing VR Metaverse for PM SHRI Schools—But is the Metaverse Still the Future?
John King’s Book ‘Teacher By Teacher’: A Global Tribute to the Transformative Power of Education
Lifestyle for Environment (LiFE): Sustainable Practices in CBSE Schools
Delhi Approves Landmark Bill to Regulate School Fees Across 1,677 Institutions
Rajasthan Cabinet Approves Bill to Regulate Coaching Centres Amid Rising Student Suicides
SGEF2023 | Special Address by Rama Datt, Trustee, Maharaja Sawai Man Singh II Trust, Jaipur
ScooNews | After Movie | ScooNews Global Educators Fest 2023
Aftermovie | NIES2 UP Chapter | 21 Jan 2023
WEBINAR | Gamification in Education: How Digital Badges Can Boost Student Motivation and Engagement
ScooNews | WEBINAR| Importance of Physical Activity for Children at School | Plaeto
SCOONEWS | WEBINAR | WHY DIGITIZING YOUR SCHOOL IS A MUST | TEACHMINT
Keynote Address | Lakshyaraj Singh Mewar
Anurag Tripathi, Secretary, CBSE at SGEF2022
How schools can nurture every student’s genius
Aftermovie | SGEF2022 | Jaipur
Li Andersson | Minister of Education | Finland
Anurag Tripathi, Secretary, Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) discusses NEP2020
ScooNews | Early Ed Asia 2019 | Aftermovie
#PodarECEconf : Pursuing quality ECE
#CBSE Class XII #Results #Highlights
The interesting story of India’s educational system | Adhitya Iyer
A young scientist’s quest for clean water
The Danger of Silence: Clint Smith
National Digital Library of India is an initiative by HRD Ministry
Remembering Kalpana Chawla on her birthday!
Message from Sadhguru for Students!
Message from Sadhguru for Students!
The Untapped Genius That Could Change Science for the Better
Eddy Zhong: How school makes kids less intelligent TEDxYouth@Beacon
#TEDxCanberra : What if every child had access to music education…
-
Education3 months agoSudha Murty Advocates Mandatory Training and Exams for Teachers Every Three Years
-
Education3 months agoHello Kids Expands to 1,000 Centres, Aims for 2,000 by 2028
-
Education3 months agoNagaland Schools Launch ‘Adolescent Girls Club’ to Empower Young Girls Under Mission Shakti
-
Education2 months ago“Be the Change in a Changing World”: Anita Karwal and Anju Chazot Reflect on NEP 2020
-
News2 months ago
CBSE Warns Dummy School Students May Be Barred from Board Exams
-
Education3 weeks agoCBSE’s ‘Sugar Boards’ Initiative: Tackling the Sweet Crisis in Indian Schools
-
Education2 months agoIs Your School Following These Mandatory CBSE Committees?
-
Education1 month agoMaharashtra to Regulate Pre-Primary Education with New Law Aligned to NEP 2020
-
Education3 months agoSunbeam Indiranagar Shines in Academics, Arts, and Sports, Cementing Its Legacy of Holistic Education
-
Education2 months agoRewriting Ambedkar: Why Students Must Know the Man Beyond the Constitution
